Info 
              3, January '99 Andreas 
              Schier 
              New Ways in Waldorf Pedagogics - School on the Road
              This is only for those who really want to - otherwise it is 
                too tough. But it is about three months of intense living and 
                joy. That is how the Waldorf teacher Andreas Schier is taking 
                students on bicycle trips, covering new territory in education 
                and relationships with adolescents.  
              .... 
              During the spring of 97 I taught - after preparing the trip for 
                nine months - as a travel teacher for the first time. Taking two 
                American teenagers, juniors from public schools in the States, 
                we were on the road in Europe for 3 months. Several severe mistakes 
                were made. The basic concept was developed one year before I joined 
                in. I didn't realize that the parents had worked on the concept 
                with the students expressing their agreement, while they secretly 
                planned a different trip on their own. Great problems arose when 
                the difference between concept or expectation and reality of the 
                trip.  
                        Furthermore, I had 
                happily agreed that I could teach and grade one of the students 
                in several subjects, as long as I documented in detail and taught 
                as close as possible to the curriculum. But we found out during 
                the trip that this agreement was far too much oriented on the 
                classroom. My idea of traveling by car instead by train was realized. 
                It was obviously cheaper and more flexible, but it turned out 
                that is was too easy and passive for the girls. Moreover, one 
                of the students realized too late that she couldn't keep her usual 
                attitude towards teachers on this trip.  
                        The biggest success 
                of the entire trip was therefore the incredible learning out of 
                the mistakes. And the students continued their travel for six 
                more weeks alone --even though they'd never traveled without their 
                parents before - since they had reached a high level of independence 
                in this area.  
              The experience led me to change several basic aspects of my concept 
                for the following three months bicycle trips through the States: 
                Taking 6 to 8 students at a time and switching from the pedagogically 
                questionable car to the highly pedagogical bicycle. It allows 
                students to be constantly active, independent and responsible 
                for their own gear. In the beginning, I am in charge of the budget 
                until the students are ready to take over. The total budget has 
                to be tight, so that inconvenience and laziness can't be matched 
                through higher expenses.  
                        The school stuff is 
                greatly reduced, because traveling - especially by bicycle - is 
                a learning experience, and book learning often doesn't fit to 
                the nature of traveling. For example, being a certificated English 
                teacher, I only tell good students, and those only sometimes, 
                about their mistakes in grammar; but after an introductory period 
                of three weeks I speak only English to the students instead. Fear 
                of making mistakes is the biggest hindrance in learning a foreign 
                language on the road. The students get the basics of American 
                history from me, while they chose biographies. They are giving 
                their talks during the first month of a trip.  
                
                Monument Valley, seen through a bicycle frame 
              For a bicycle trip with high school students three months seem 
                to be optimal; having more time it'd be possible to integrate 
                volunteer work at a project. Three months correspond with a season. 
                It's possible to go through deep experiences in this period. The 
                long duration of a trip is also important to enhance perseverance 
                decisively. And experience also showed that students did well 
                making up for the stuff they missed at school.  
                        Participating students 
                are not only at the top of their class. Students and parents from 
                10 different waldorf schools all agree that the trips have been 
                highly successful. Therefore it seems difficult to understand 
                at first that, the faculties are not interested in these experiences 
                becoming better known and reachable for more students - through 
                slide shows for the whole high school, for example. One reason 
                is certainly that most Waldorf teachers are overworked. Then there 
                is insecurity what might come out of these experiences and how 
                to react. Is it possible that today's structure of school is loosening? 
                 
                        The classmate of one 
                particpants asked the faculty for the allowance to work at a social 
                project in San Francisco for three months. The teachers were a 
                bit at a loss. On the other hand, the business world doesn't get 
                tired expressing that knowledge is only one needed aspect, like 
                flexibility, an independent personality and team work. How can 
                these capacities be enhanced while the pressure for good grades 
                is growing?  
              How does a trip actually work? In the beginning, I take care 
                of all the duties basically, be it the budget and bookkeeping, 
                preparing and finding the route, shopping or finding a place to 
                stay and I think aloud a lot. At the same time, decisions are 
                made as soon as possible by the group. The students learn about 
                the difficulties of concensus. Depending on the situation though, 
                majority, minority or I decide.        Important 
                presupositions for the independence on the road are a good and 
                awake handling of the bike and knowing how to read a map. An unwanted 
                detour is very helpful for this. Subsequently, we split up into 
                small groups for part of the day, soon whole days and finally 
                solo rides are possible. My job is "to get out of the way". This 
                is also done practically towards the end, when the group is ready 
                to cycle alone for a couple or few days.  
                        This may sound too 
                adventurous at first. But the students are well prepared then 
                and very grateful for the trust given to them. Moreover, the US 
                is not, as many Americans think, a generally dangerous country 
                at all. It all depends on how one is acting and where to be when. 
               
                
                having just returned to Germany 
              Not much is happening to strangers and if so, a grave mistake 
                was made usually. Traveling like we do, the trust in the world 
                is growing - and it is not a blind trust. Last trip we stayed 
                overnight privately 20 times (!) - mostly invited spontaneously 
                - to camp out in the yard, sleep on the floor or even in beds. 
                The hospitality is one of the greatest gifts that we receive. 
                Our nights camping in nature remain unforgettable - in warm nights 
                without tents - be it at the Pacific Coast, in the vastness of 
                the Southwest or the Rocky Mountains.  
                        Our daily budget of 
                $ 12 per person is mainly used to fill our hungry stomachs. Some 
                moneys goes for campgrounds in national or state parks; at times 
                even with showers. But football fields of schools (unofficially, 
                during summer vacation) and churches prove to be great spots for 
                the night as well.  
                By now, I put great emphasis on riding 55 to 60 miles per day. 
                It makes the cycling so much easier, and it's no problem to have 
                single students cycle up to 125 a day, if they want to find their 
                limits. Every trip is very different because of the participating 
                students. We can take the liberty to acknowledge individual desires 
                and needs. 
               It's a rule on all trips that students cannot use phone, fax 
                or email to contact family and friends at home. It gives the students 
                the possibility of developing more independence. The parents show 
                their trust and practice "letting go". The students write letters 
                and postcards as often as they want to, while parents and friends 
                get "only" three mailing addresses. And we truly celebrate on 
                those three occasions. 
              These trips are not cheap, but inexpensive; with my pay being 
                below that of any Waldorf teacher. Trips planned for 1999 cost 
                up to $ 2,200, to the States $ 2,700, plus pocket money and gear. 
                Getting the gear is very inexpensive when bought or lent from 
                former students. And during the last trip we saved $ 500 to be 
                given to a student of the next trip as a scholarship.  
              What is planned for 99? Two possibilities for each of the so 
                called spring and fall trip: students and parents make the final 
                decision of where we're going.  
                        One option for the 
                spring - April, May, June - is a trip to the States again. This 
                time exploring the East Coast: From New Orleans through the "deep" 
                South, the Appalachian Mountains, civil war battle fields and 
                Washington D. C. to New York City.  
                        The other option is 
                Turkey: country, culture and religion of 2.3 million Turks living 
                in Germany. Carsten, from the last trip, told me about his encounters 
                with young Turks. Usually, it's like "Why do you stare at me? 
                Fuck off!" Imagine he'd know some Turkish and would tell aout 
                his trip! So, the Mediterranean Coast, Anatolia, Capadocia, Black 
                Sea Coast and finally Istanbul.  
                        For the fall I am planning 
                to travel to Southwestern Europe. The theme of the trip is "ecumeny": 
                a visit fo the Taize Community, the Central Massiv (mountains), 
                the area where Kathares (a Christian Community during the Middle 
                Ages) at the Northeastern side of the Pyrenees, the "El Camino 
                Real" (an old pilgrim's trail) to Santiago de Compostella in Northwestern 
                Spain and we might end up in Lisbon, Portugal.  
                        The alternative is 
                Eastern Europe: Czech Republic (Prague), Poland (concentration 
                camp Oswiecim), Slovak Republic (High Tatra Mountains), Hungary 
                (Budapest), Slovenia and Italy (river Po). This is only for those 
                who really want to; otherwise it's too tough. But it is about 
                three months of intense living and joy. 
               Learning without a classroom - some background info 
              During my studies at the Mannheim, Germany, and Rudolf Steiner 
                college in Fair Oaks, California, I understood of Waldorf pedagogics 
                that the main goal is to foster the individual personality and 
                general capacities. Basic capacities like independence and responsibility 
                (two sides of a coin), activity, perseverance and hope (both are 
                needed to reach goals), trust into the world, love of nature, 
                creativity with others, the environment and oneself and to learn 
                "to live with the unknown" - no need for everything being planned 
                beforehand; inner instead of outer security.  
              My internships were spent mainly at a boarding school, since 
                I was searching from the beginning for a deeper connection with 
                the students like it's especially outside the classroom possible. 
                Inside and outside the classroom I observed especially with high 
                school students, that more than a few gained the conviction that 
                real life doesn't take place before after school. I know this 
                attitude very well from my own years at a public high school. 
                But according to my understanding and work as a teacher, school 
                means life and school of life.  
              What does today's life look like? It seems that our society - 
                in Germany and elsewhere - moved into many dead ends. It's most 
                obvious in our exploiting the earth, but also in other areas like 
                treating one another, people of foreign countries or supplying 
                the basic needs of all of humanity. I only see the possibility 
                of a "healing" future, if new ways and developments come forth 
                from the youth.  
              Talking with adolescents, I heard often that they don't have 
                any hope to change things to the better. The reasons given were 
                "that everything is fixed and declared for good" or "I am feeling 
                weak and helpless and have only few positive experiences to put 
                against this". Moreover, many adolescents complain that they need 
                outer pressure to become active and that they face great difficulties 
                to reach goals independently.  
                
                Andreas Schier (2nd from the right) "School on the road is 
                an alternative to classroom teaching" 
              Since I used to be a "full time" backpack traveler, I looked 
                into more experience oriented education. It is usually used wen 
                other measurements fail. The "problem" student - outwardly or 
                inwardly destructive, sometimes into drugs - spend time on a farm, 
                a sailing boat, a hospital in a third world country or learn how 
                to survive in nature. 
               All these experiences, participation on class trips and a thesis 
                about "drug problems at Waldorf Schools" led me to the question: 
                Why are those measures only taken when great problems are faced? 
                Why cannot "normal" students gain from these experiences? 
               The decision to become a "travel teacher" was clear. I used 
                to travel extensively before my studies and went to places and 
                countries for my internships. My own experiences were obvious, 
                the above mentioned general capacities are greatly enhanced through 
                traveling. Every student understands that "school on the road" 
                is deeply connected to life. And especially nowadays, a deeper 
                understanding of foreign cultures and knowledge of foreign languages 
                are important. 
               A further decisive aspect of travel teaching is the possibility 
                to work on a different student - teacher relationship. Being on 
                the road, I don't have to call the students attention on their 
                mistakes and often, since the world is working as a mirror and 
                leads to a direct experience. It is on the other hand important 
                to be quiet instead of saying "I told you before." At the same 
                time, I am partly a teacher, but also legal guardian, participant 
                or friend. Truthfulness becomes even more important, since everybody 
                gets "recognized" anyway.  
              The nature of the trips doesn't make it just desirable, but necessary 
                because of the great responsibility, that open and honest relationships 
                are developed. Attitudes like "as long as I don't get caught" 
                don't work, although smaller bendings of the rules happen; which 
                is important and right for adolescents. A "promise of honesty" 
                (instead of the "code of honor") is integrated: given only voluntarily. 
                Students report to me at the next opportunity, should certain 
                things have happened; they call it "to confess".  
              Living together so closely opens the possibility to pay special 
                attention to every student. Everybody has to be treated differently 
                to be true to the different needs and different personalities. 
                The students are truly co-organizers on such a trip unlike what 
                can be done in a classroom (usually). The work - cycling, travel 
                activities, covering of basic needs and "school stuff" - is agreed 
                upon by the students, but the actual doing and integrating leisure 
                time - "breathing out" - is more and more put into the hands of 
                the students. And it is very important that the students experience 
                free times for initiatives; free, because they don't have to be 
                used in a certain way.  
                
                Basti feeling free 
              Being a teacher, I try to become ever more aware of how I am 
                working with the students. When do I use reward, punishment or 
                other forms of pressure to influence? Do I take advantage of the 
                above mentioned inability to become active without pressure? Or 
                do I enhance real interest and integrity?  
                        Moreover, I find it 
                important for a teacher to show my own vulnerability. It is so 
                much easier to teach when there's no expectation of making no 
                mistakes. A deep and human development is generally only possible, 
                when vulnerability and weaknesses are recognized as realities 
                and furthermore don't need to be hidden. It's not a question of 
                manipulation, but of understanding. 
                        Some of the possibilities 
                mentioned in this article are reachable with small groups only. 
                A class with 3 or 4 teachers sums up to the same "quantity relationship", 
                let's say 1:8. But the teacher-student relationship is too distanced. 
               
                
               |